Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Golimumab, A Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Subcutaneously Every Four Weeks as Monotherapy in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy: Week 104 Results of Clinical, Radiographic and Safety Assessments
Background/Purpose: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of golimumab (GLM) as monotherapy in Japanese patients (pts) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite DMARD therapy.
Methods: GO-MONO is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study in pts with active RA despite treatment with DMARDs. Pts were randomized to SC PBO, GLM50 mg, or GLM100 mg q4wks as monotherapy. At wk16, pts in the PBO group (grp) crossed over (CO) GLM50 mg q4wks. Treatment with GLM continued to wk120. Primary endpoint was the proportion of pts achieving ACR20 at wk14. Secondary endpoints included ACR50, ACR70, and ACR-N, DAS28 and HAQ and changes from BL to wks 24/52/104/120 in total modified vdH-Sharp (vdH-S) score. Data were analyzed using all patients receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment. Missing clinical response data were not imputed. For vdH-S score, treatment grp comparisons at wks 52/104 were based on initial randomized grps. Missing data were imputed using median change from BL in total vdH-S scores (TSS) of all pts or by linear extrapolation. Wk52 data have been reported; wk104 results of efficacy are now reported. Safety data from all treatment period are reported as incidence per 100-patient-years.
Results: Long-term efficacy and safety data are shown in the Table. Clinical remission was defined as DAS28(ESR) < 2.6 and HAQ remission was defined as HAQ < 0.5 maintained between wk52 and wk104. Median changes from baseline to wk52 were 1.0 in PBO and GLM 50mg, and 0 in GLM100 mg. Median changes from baseline to wk104 in PBO, GLM 50 and 100 mg were 1.5, 1.25 and 1.0, respectively. The proportions of pts with changes in TSS greater than the smallest detectable change (SDC) were also maintained from wk52 and wk104. Proportion of pts with no progression (change in TSS≤0) were slightly decrease from wk52 to wk104 in both of GLM 50 mg and 100 mg. Safety finding are also summarized in the Table. Two deaths were reported, one in GLM 50 mg (brain stem haemorrhage) and one in 100 mg (pancreatic carcinoma). Incidences of SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation in GLM 50 mg were higher than 100 mg. There were no cases of tuberculosis or lymphoma reported.
Conclusion: Treatment with GLM50 mg and 100 mg monotherapy sustained the efficacy of signs/symptoms during 104wks. Inhibition of structural damage in GLM 100 mg was relatively greater than GLM 50mg, however the progression went on slowly during 104wks in both of the GLM groups. The GLM safety profile was similar to other anti-TNF agents.
|
Evaluation at |
PBO a) |
GLM |
|
50 mg |
100 mg |
|||
Efficacy results |
||||
DAS(ESR) remission (<2.6) n/N(%) |
Wk 52 Wk 104 |
17/85 ( 20.0) 27/78 ( 34.6) |
18/84 ( 21.4) 29/74 ( 39.2) |
26/94 ( 27.7) 32/90 ( 35.6) |
HAQ remission (<0.5) n/N(%) |
Wk 52 Wk 104 |
46/85 ( 54.1) 51/78 ( 65.4) |
37/84 ( 44.0) 46/74 ( 62.2) |
52/94 ( 55.3) 53/90 ( 58.9) |
Change from BL in TSS b) n Mean (SD) Median |
Wk 52 Wk 104 |
83 2.81 (7.139) 1.0 83 3.61 (8.922) 1.5 |
82 3.31 (6.192) 1.0 82 4.34 (7.720) 1.25 |
93 1.56 (5.093) 0.0 93 2.64 (6.507) 1.0 |
Pts with progression based on TSS >SDC c) n/N(%) |
Wk 52 Wk 104 |
17/83 ( 20.5) 16/75 ( 21.3) |
16/82 ( 19.5) 16/72 ( 22.2) |
16/92 ( 17.4) 21/89 ( 23.6) |
Pts with change ≤0 in TSS from baseline n/N(%) |
Wk 52 Wk 104 |
37/105 ( 35.2) 28/75 ( 37.3) |
46/101 ( 45.5) 22/72 ( 30.6) |
54/102 ( 52.9) 40/89 ( 44.9) |
Safety results from all treatment period
|
||||
Avg duration of follow-up (wks) |
15.0 |
97.1 |
110.9 |
|
Incidence per 100 patient-years (95%CI) Deaths, SAEs Patients with AEs leading to discontinuation Patients with 1 or more serious infections |
0.00 (0.00, 9.88) 6.63 (0.80, 23.94) 9.95 (2.05, 29.09) 3.30 (0.08, 18.38) |
0.28 (0.01, 1.55) 14.47 (10.74, 19.08) 7.83 (5.20, 11.32) 3.09 (1.54, 5.53) |
0.46 (0.01, 2.56) 7.92 (4.61, 12.68) 5.07 (2.53, 9.07) 3.75 (1.62, 7.39) |
a) All patients received placebo crossed over to GLM50 mg afer wk 16.
b) Missing data were imputed using median change from BL of all pts or by linear extrapolation.
c) SDC = 5.18 at wk 52, SDC = 5.65 at wk 104
Disclosure:
T. Takeuchi,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
M. Harigai,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
Y. Tanaka,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
H. Yamanaka,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
N. Ishiguro,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
K. Yamamoto,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
M. Kanazawa,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
Y. Murakami,
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K,
3;
T. Yoshinari,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
D. Baker,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
3;
N. Miyasaka,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
;
T. Koike,
Janssen Research and Development, LLC,
.
« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/golimumab-a-human-anti-tnf-monoclonal-antibody-administered-subcutaneously-every-four-weeks-as-monotherapy-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-despite-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drug-t/