ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1091

Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Niall Halliday1,2, Caroline Treanor2, Rose Galvin3 and Jason Brooks4, 1Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, 2Physiotherapy, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 3Clinical Therapies, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland, 4Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: fibromyalgia, multidisciplinary pain team and rehabilitation

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session: Rehabilitation

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a common, chronic pain condition with complex multiple symptoms. Combinations of therapies in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (MPRP) are recommended by several international guidelines for the management of FMS. A number of primary research studies have evaluated the impact of MPRPs. However, no study has evaluated the totality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of MPRP’s for FMS.

The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to examine the impact of MPRP’s  on levels of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction in people with FMS. 

Methods:

An electronic search was conducted and included PubMed (1950 to present)

EMBASE (1980 to present), CINAHL (1982 to present), Science Direct (1985 and Databases of existing reviews such as The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (The Cochrane Library, latest issue) The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, latest issue) as well as electronic dissertation/theses databases and a grey literature search. The references of identified articles and reviews were checked, clinical trial registers and the Science Citation Index searched. Content experts were also contacted for additional or unpublished studies. 

Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they met the following inclusion criteria: study design; randomized controlled trials (RCTs),  population; individuals with FMS, intervention; MPRP with involvement from a physician and two other health professionals, comparison; less intensive MPRP or no intervention, outcomes;impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction.

Studies were screened based on title/abstract and irrelevant studies eliminated. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Finally, both a meta-analysis and a narrative synthesis were performed to evaluate the level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of MPRP’s. 

Results:

After screening 11,280 abstracts, nine RCT’s (1216 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of participants was 47.1 years, the mean duration FMS was 10.29 years and the population was 90.4% female. All MPRP’s consisted of both a physical and a psychological intervention. Comparison groups included waiting list control with exercise, pharmacological treatment, less intensive MPRP’s, and no intervention. The methodological quality of the studies was variable. A meta-analysis revealed that MPRP’s are effective in the long term at reducing to pain levels ([FEM, SMD=-0.27 (95% CI -0.45, -0.10), p<0.01 I2=45%]) and disease impact [FEM, MD=-6.24 (95% CI -9.32, -5.95), p<0.01 I2=47%]. The narrative synthesis revealed moderate to low quality evidence in support of MPRP’s FMS. 

Conclusion:

These findings suggest that MPRP have a positive impact on long-term pain levels and disease impact in people with FMS. There is also some indication that the tailoring of treatments to specific subgroups of patients may be the most effective method of delivery. Future research should be directed towards analyzing such sub-groups analysis.


Disclosure: N. Halliday, None; C. Treanor, None; R. Galvin, None; J. Brooks, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Halliday N, Treanor C, Galvin R, Brooks J. Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-multidisciplinary-pain-rehabilitation-programs-for-patients-with-fibromyalgia-syndrome-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-multidisciplinary-pain-rehabilitation-programs-for-patients-with-fibromyalgia-syndrome-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology