ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 579

Methotrexate Does Not Influence 1-Year Bone Mineral Density in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Richard Koch1, Thomas Barnetche2, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand1, Alain Cantagrel1, Arnaud Constantin3 and Yannick Degboé4, 1Rheumatology Center, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France, 2Rheumatology Department, Pellegrin University Hospital, BORDEAUX, France, 3Inserm U558, Rheumatology Center, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France, 4Rheumatology, Rheumatology Center, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Bone density, methotrexate (MTX), Osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of peripheral and axial fractures.  Methotrexate is the first-line treatment in this disease. MTX has been suspected to play a noxious role on bone of patients treated for leukemia or RA. We aimed to assess the effect of MTX on BMD after 1 year of treatment, in patients with RA.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature. Two authors (RK and YD) independently screened PubMed-Medline, the Cochrane library and Ovid journals databases. Key words were: “rheumatoid arthritis” AND “methotrexate” AND (“mineral densityÓ or “remodeling markers” or “formation” or “resorptionÓ or “boneÓ). Data, including BMD variation, were extracted using a predetermined form. We selected all prospective studies, with assessment of baseline and 1-year lumbar spine, femoral neck or hip BMD, in patients treated by methotrexate monotherapy. This screening was supplemented by hand searching of relevant references in selected papers. Studies were limited to those concerning human species, published in English, before March 2015. Pooled BMD variation was computed by meta-analysis.

Results: We identified 433 articles in PubMed database and 7 in Cochrane or Ovid databases. We selected 5 eligible references for the systematic review and 4 relevant for meta-analysis. We analyzed 144 patients. 106 were women, 94 displayed early arthritis (<1 year), they had active RA. Two studies included in the meta-analysis contained possibility of bisphosphonates treatment and steroids therapy (Table 1). Meta-analysis concerning 1-year lumbar BMD variation did not show a significant variation: 0.00 g/cm2, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) [-0.02, 0.02] (Figure 1a). Meta-analysis concerning 1-year femoral neck BMD variation showed a non-significant variation: -0.01 g/cm2, 95%CI [-0.04, +0.01] (Figure 1b). Meta-analysis was not possible for 1-year total hip BMD variation. Estimated heterogeneity of studies was high.

Table 1. Main characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis

Reference

Study type

MTX Population

Age, mean  +/- SD

Disease duration (year)

Percentage female

Corticotherapy (Prednisone ³10 mg/day)

Bisphosphonates

DAS 28 +/- SD

Van Der Goes, 2013

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind

84

52 +/- 13

< 1

65

Yes

Yes

3.2 +/- 1.1

Haugeberg, 2009

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind

10

53.1 +/-13.7

< 1

70

Yes

Yes

7 +/- 0.9

Marotte, 2007

Case-control

99

53.9 +/- 15.9

10.9 +/-8.9

79

No

Yes

5 +/- 1.15

Minaur, 2002

Non- randomized, longitudinal

28

62.6 +/- 8.9

6.6

79

No

No

5.27 +/- 1

Mazzantini, 2000

Non-randomized, longitudinal

22

59 +/- 9

9 +/- 9

100

No

No

–

Figure 1a. Lumbar BMD meta-analysis

Figure 1b. Femoral BMD meta-analysis

Conclusion: We did not observed a significant variation of 1-year lumbar and femoral neck BMD in patients treated by MTX, thus suggesting a neutral effect of MTX on BMD in RA.


Disclosure: R. Koch, None; T. Barnetche, None; A. Ruyssen-Witrand, None; A. Cantagrel, None; A. Constantin, None; Y. Degboé, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Koch R, Barnetche T, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Cantagrel A, Constantin A, Degboé Y. Methotrexate Does Not Influence 1-Year Bone Mineral Density in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/methotrexate-does-not-influence-1-year-bone-mineral-density-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/methotrexate-does-not-influence-1-year-bone-mineral-density-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology