ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 477

On-Demand Use of Etanercept Only for Disease Flares Reduced the Disease Activity Score and Structural Damage Equivalent to Fully-Use of Etanercept in RA Patients

Kentaro Inui1, Tatsuya Koike2, Masahiro Tada3, Yuko Sugioka2, Kenji Mamoto4, Tadashi Okano4, Akira Sakawa5, Kenzo Fukushima6 and Hiroaki Nakamura4, 1Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, 2Center for Senile Degenerative Disorders (CSDD), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, 3Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, OSAKA, Japan, 4Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, 5Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 6Orthopaedic Surgery, Fujiidera Municipal Hospital, Fujiidera, Japan

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologic agents, etanercept and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are essential in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Biological DMARDs are particularly recommended for patients with active RA who may incur further joint damage. However, in daily clinical practice, some patients with RA do not accept or discontinue bDMARDs because of their high cost. Similar to use of glucocorticoids, the use of bDMARDs may be limited to periods of high disease activity to help reduce patient costs. For this option to work well, the efficacy of a bDMARD should be maintained when restarting the same bDMARDs after several periods of discontinuation, bDMARDs holiday. We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, non-blinded study (RESUME study: UMIN000008164) to examine the sustained efficacy of etanercept (ETN) after starting and stopping ETN several times in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: Thirty-one bDMARD-naive patients with RA with moderate to severe disease activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] of ≥3.2) were enrolled in this study with written consent from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012. Their average age was 60 years and average disease duration was 5 years. ETN was administered at 50 mg/week and discontinued when low disease activity (LDA) (DAS28 of <3.2) was achieved. Upon recurrence, the same dose of ETN was administered with observation every 2 months. This strategy was maintained for 2 years. If patients did not achieve LDA within 3 months of ETN administration, other synthetic DMARDs other than glucocorticoids and tacrolimus were administered. If LDA was not achieved within 6 months, the patients were withdrawn from the trial. Clinical measure by DAS28, blood test, radiography (mTSS) was analyzed at baseline, 1 year, and 2year visit. In order to compare the structural damage of this study population, another series of 31 patients with RA treated with fully-use of ETN were evaluated by mTSS.

Results: Thirteen of the 31 patients had an inadequate response to ETN and were withdrawn from the study. Five patients had no flare-up of disease activity after discontinuation of ETN during the observation period. In the remaining 13 patients (8 women), on-demand use of ETN was carried out to maintain LDA. The mean dose of methotrexate in these 13 patients was 10 mg/week, rheumatoid factor was positive in 11 patients, and the mean follow-up period was 20.5 months. All 13 patients achieved LDA at the final follow-up after starting and stopping the ETN several times. The cost-saving calculation was approximately 28% among the five patients who maintained LDA with no need to restart ETN. Structural remission (DmTSS =<0.5) was achieved in 82% of the 13 patients as evaluated by the total Sharp score in 1 year, and 50% in 2 years. Structural remission rate in this study population in 1 year was equivalent to that of full dose use (p=0.464, Fisher’s exact probability test).

Conclusion: On-demand use of ETN for disease flares reduced disease activity score and structural damage at low cost.


Disclosure: K. Inui, Takeda Pharm. Co., Chugai Pharm. Co., Janssen Pharm. K.K., Abbvie GK, Astellas Pharma Inc., UCB Japan Co., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Santen Pharm. Co., 8; T. Koike, Takeda Pharm. Co., Chugai Pharm. Co., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Eisai, Abbott Japan, Teijin Pharma, Banyu Pharm., and Ono Pharm., 8; M. Tada, None; Y. Sugioka, None; K. Mamoto, None; T. Okano, None; A. Sakawa, None; K. Fukushima, None; H. Nakamura, Eisai Co.,Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Pfizer Japan Inc., Nippon Zoki Pharmace, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Inui K, Koike T, Tada M, Sugioka Y, Mamoto K, Okano T, Sakawa A, Fukushima K, Nakamura H. On-Demand Use of Etanercept Only for Disease Flares Reduced the Disease Activity Score and Structural Damage Equivalent to Fully-Use of Etanercept in RA Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/on-demand-use-of-etanercept-only-for-disease-flares-reduced-the-disease-activity-score-and-structural-damage-equivalent-to-fully-use-of-etanercept-in-ra-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/on-demand-use-of-etanercept-only-for-disease-flares-reduced-the-disease-activity-score-and-structural-damage-equivalent-to-fully-use-of-etanercept-in-ra-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology