ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 365

Can We Use Bone Turnover Markers As Targets for Antiresorptive Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis? an Analysis from Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials

JP Brown1, P Dakin2, P Hadji3, MR McClung4, PD Miller5, J-Y Reginster6, RB Wagman2, A Wang2 and E McCloskey7, 1Laval University and CHU de Québec (CHUL) Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany, 4Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, 5Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO, 6University of Liège, Liège, Belgium, 7University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Bone turnover markers, denosumab, osteoporosis and treatment guidlelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease - Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

 

Background/Purpose:
Bone turnover markers
(BTMs) respond faster than bone mineral density as an indicator of response to
therapy in osteoporotic patients; however, it remains unclear when and how best
to evaluate treatment response using BTMs. Denosumab (DMAb) has a dynamic BTM
profile over the 6-month dosing period (ie, reduction in turnover with release
of inhibition at the end of the dosing interval)
. This analysis assessed
the use of potential target values for serum
C-telopeptide of type 1
collagen

(CTX) and serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) to explore
guidance to clinicians for monitoring postmenopausal
women with osteoporosis (PMO) during treatment.

 

Methods:
BTMs measured at
baseline in treatment-naïve PMO entering FREEDOM, a large randomized,
placebo-controlled study of DMAb (Cummings et al NEJM 2009), were used
to derive threshold values at the 5th percentiles of the observed distributions. The
relevant values for serum
CTX (N = 7594) and P1NP (N = 1023) were 0.2 ng/mL and 25.8
ng/mL, respectively. These BTM target
values were applied to the study
populations of DECIDE (Brown et al JBMR 2009) and STAND (Kendler et al JBMR
2010) enabling evaluation of a population-based assessment of BTM target
values. DECIDE (N = 1189) and STAND (N = 504) were phase 3, randomized,
double-blind, double-dummy studies to compare the efficacy and safety of DMAb
(60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) with alendronate (ALN; 70 mg weekly oral
tablet) in treatment-naïve PMO or PMO already receiving ALN, respectively. The
percentage of subjects in each treatment group with BTMs below
the predefined target
values was
evaluated
midcycle at month 3 after the 1st dose of DMAb, which also enabled trough values for ALN, and then re-evaluated
at month 9
. Subjects with BTM values below the predefined targets at baseline were excluded from the analysis.

 

Results:
A
total of 1112 (93.5%) women in
DECIDE and 155 (30.8%) women in STAND had CTX values ≥ 0.2 ng/mL and
P1NP values ≥ 25.8 ng/mL at baseline. Table 1 reports the percentage of subjects with CTX
and P1NP values below the respective targets at months 3 and 9. The predefined
target values were almost universally achieved at 3 and 9 months on DMAb,
whereas the target for CTX, for example, on ALN was only achieved in 49.1% and
19.0% of treatment-naïve and ALN-pretreated PMO, respectively, at month 3.

 

Conclusion:
In this population-based analysis, in
both treatment-naïve and pretreated PMO, BTMs have utility in determining
response, and awareness of failure to reach a treatment target may help improve
clinical management.


Disclosure: J. Brown, Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, 2,Amgen, Eli Lilly, Radius, 5,Amgen, Eli Lilly, 8; P. Dakin, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; P. Hadji, Amgen, 2,Amgen, 5,Amgen, 8; M. McClung, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, 5,Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 8; P. Miller, Alexion, Amgen, Merck, Merck Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Regeneron, National Bone Health Alliance, Lilly, Pfizer, Radius, 2,Owner & Medical Director of Colorado Center for Bone Research, 4,Alexion, Radius, Amgen, Lilly, 5,Alexion, Radius, Amgen, Lilly, 8; J. Y. Reginster, Servier, Novartis, Negma, Lilly, Wyeth, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKiine, Roche, Merckle, Nycomed, NPS, Theramex, UCB, 5,Merck Sharp and Dohme, Lilly, Rottapharm, IBSA, Genevrier, Novartis, Servier, Roche, GlaxoSmithKiine, Teijin, Teva, Ebewee Pharma, Zodiac, Analis, Theramex, Nycomed, Novo-Nordisk, Nolver, 9,Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Rottapharm, Teva, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, GlaxoSmithKiine, Amgen, Servier, 2; R. Wagman, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; A. Wang, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; E. McCloskey, ActiveSignal, Amgen, ARUK, I3 Innovus, MRC, IOF, Unilever, 2,ActiveSignal, Amgen, Consilient Healthcare, GSK, Internis, Lilly, Merck, Synexus, UCB, 5,Amgen, Consilient Healthcare, GSK, Internis, Lilly, UCB, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Brown J, Dakin P, Hadji P, McClung M, Miller P, Reginster JY, Wagman R, Wang A, McCloskey E. Can We Use Bone Turnover Markers As Targets for Antiresorptive Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis? an Analysis from Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-use-bone-turnover-markers-as-targets-for-antiresorptive-treatment-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-an-analysis-from-two-phase-3-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-use-bone-turnover-markers-as-targets-for-antiresorptive-treatment-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-an-analysis-from-two-phase-3-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology