ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 131

Frequency of Lipid Testing and Management Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Compared to the General Population and Patients with Diabetes

Iris Navarro-Millan1, Shuo Yang2, Monica Safford3, Lang Chen3, Huifeng Yun4 and Jeffrey R. Curtis3, 1Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Cholesterol, Lipids, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and test

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster I: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment Strategies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) have high coronary heart disease (CHD) burden and accelerated
atherosclerotic status. However, limited data suggest that these patients may
be screened less frequently than other patients with similar CHD risk.  To
evaluate the rate of lipid testing and management among RA patients and compare
it both to the general population and diabetes (DM) patients.

Methods:   We used a mix of private and public health
plans claims data from 2006 to 2010 with medical and pharmacy coverage.
Eligible participants were required to 1) have at least 12 months of continuous
medical and pharmacy coverage (baseline period), and 2) have 2+ physician
diagnosis and relevant medications to categorize them as having 1) RA and DM;
2) RA only; 3) DM only; 4) Neither RA nor DM. Patients with prevalent myocardial
infarction (MI)/stroke/CHD during baseline were excluded. Each of these groups
had a follow up time of 2 years. We calculated the proportion of patients with low
density lipoprotein (LDL) lab test during the 2 year follow-up. In a subgroup
analysis, we determined the proportion of patients with lab results available
with LDL ≥ 130 mg/dL that initiated treatment with statins. We use
chi-square tests to compare differences between the 4 cohorts in the proportion
tested for LDL and initiating statins.

Results: There were 428,109 eligible patients distributed
between the 4 cohorts (Table). Overall, 60% were women. The overall age
distribution was:  12% ≤ 40; 29%, 41-65; and 59% >65 years old. RA
patients were less frequently tested for LDL compared to DM patients, with or
without RA (p-value <0.001 for all comparisons) (Table). Conditional on
having LDL ≥ 130 mg/dL, RA patients were less likely to be started on a
statin compared to DM patients (p-value < 0.001), and were marginally more
likely to be initiated on statins compared to the general population (p-value =
0.045). There was no difference in the statin prescription trend between DM and
RA patients vs. only RA patients (p-value =0.083)

Conclusion: RA patients are less frequently screened
and managed for hyperlipidemia compared DM patients. Despite higher CHD risks
in RA patients, hyperlipidemia screening and treatment rates in RA patients
were no better than the general population. Further studies to investigate the
reasons and potential interventions to ameliorate this care gap among RA
patients are needed.

Table: Frequency of lipid testing among patients with rheumatoid
arthritis, diabetes, both or neither condition

Outcome

RA Only

Diab Only

RA & Diab

Neither

 

N =20,148

N = 100,971

N = 3,358

N = 303,632

Screening: LDL checked during 2-year period, %

46

63

62

45

Treatment: statin initiation (among subgroup of patients with lab results available and LDL ≥ 130 mg/dL not already on therapy), %

13

26

28

9

 


Disclosure: I. Navarro-Millan, None; S. Yang, None; M. Safford, None; L. Chen, None; H. Yun, None; J. R. Curtis, Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Navarro-Millan I, Yang S, Safford M, Chen L, Yun H, Curtis JR. Frequency of Lipid Testing and Management Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Compared to the General Population and Patients with Diabetes [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/frequency-of-lipid-testing-and-management-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-compared-to-the-general-population-and-patients-with-diabetes/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/frequency-of-lipid-testing-and-management-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-compared-to-the-general-population-and-patients-with-diabetes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology