ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 125

Implementation of a Bone Health Team Markedly Improves Osteoporosis Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation Rates Compared to Standard Primary Care Practice

Karla L. Miller1,2, Marissa P. Grotzke1, Phillip Lawrence3, Yanina Rosenblum4, Richard Nelson5,6, Joanne Lafleur7,8 and Grant W. Cannon1, 1Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Internal Medicine-Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, SLC, UT, 3Pharmacology, Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, 5Epidemiology, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, 6Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 7Pharmacology, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, 8University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: DXA, osteoporosis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster I: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment Strategies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Despite the availability of effective therapies for fracture prevention, osteoporosis screening and treatment rates in practice are low.   Fracture liaison services are effective at reducing secondary fractures, but primary prevention models are limited.  The Salt Lake City VA Health Care System (SLCVAHCS) partnered with primary care providers (PCPs) to develop a bone health team (BHT) to improve the management of patients at risk for osteoporosis.  This analysis compared patients enrolled in the BHT to similar patients with standard management.

Methods: Patients enrolled in the community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) of the SLCVAHCS from Feb 1, 2012 – Feb 1, 2015 were included if 1) the patient was enrolled in a CBOC PCP panel for 1 year prior to the date of implementation of the BHT, 2) had one PCP visit during this interval and 3) men age ≥70 and women age ≥65.  Exclusion criteria were 1) no PCP assignment; or, 2) death in the pre-index period. The primary intervention was placement of a BHT e-consult.  Primary outcomes were: completion of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan; 25(OH) D measurement; diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis; and initiation of osteoporosis medication.  All patients started out as unexposed, but some went on to receive the primary intervention; patients were followed until the earliest of: occurrence of a primary outcome; or, the end of the observation period.  Between group differences were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with enrollment in BHT as a time-dependent exposure.  Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, sex, multiple co-morbidities, baseline pharmacologic agents, site of CBOC, and PCP discipline.

Results: Of the 7,644 patients evaluated, 975 were enrolled in the BHT.  This cohort was predominantly male (97.8%) with an average age of 79.8 years.  Patients enrolled in BHT were significantly younger, more likely to live in rural areas, and more likely to have a physician as a PCP versus those not enrolled in BHT. More patients in BHT had diabetes, a prior diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia, prior treatment with osteoporosis medications, and a greater likelihood of having been seen by a nurse practitioner.  Fewer patients in the BHT had been seen by a physician’s assistant, had vitamin D deficiency, or had prior vitamin D testing.  In both univariate and multivariable regression analyses, patients in BHT were significantly more likely to undergo DXA, 25(OH) D testing, be diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis, and be treated with osteoporosis therapy (Table). 

Table: Univariate and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards regression results of BHT Intervention Compared to Standard Management

 

Univariate Results

Multivariable Results

 

 

95% Confidence Interval

 

 

95% Confidence Interval

 

Outcome

HR

Lower

Upper

P-value

HR

Lower

Upper

P-value

DXA

111.4

90.9

136.4

<.0001

176.1

125.9

246.3

<.0001

25 OH

1.403

1.258

1.564

<.0001

1.817

1.574

2.098

<.0001

Medication

13.78

10.76

17.64

<.0001

20.24

13.31

30.78

<.0001

Osteopenia

36.34

29.01

45.52

<.0001

51.39

34.62

76.29

<.0001

Osteoporosis

11.22

9.01

13.98

<.0001

18.06

12.50

26.08

<.0001

Conclusion: BHT implementation significantly increases the rate of screening, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in CBOCs of the SLCVAHCS.  The impact on fragility fractures will require longer follow-up.  Similar programs could be considered to improve the primary prevention of osteoporosis in other primary care settings.


Disclosure: K. L. Miller, None; M. P. Grotzke, None; P. Lawrence, None; Y. Rosenblum, None; R. Nelson, None; J. Lafleur, None; G. W. Cannon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Miller KL, Grotzke MP, Lawrence P, Rosenblum Y, Nelson R, Lafleur J, Cannon GW. Implementation of a Bone Health Team Markedly Improves Osteoporosis Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation Rates Compared to Standard Primary Care Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/implementation-of-a-bone-health-team-markedly-improves-osteoporosis-screening-diagnosis-and-treatment-initiation-rates-compared-to-standard-primary-care-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/implementation-of-a-bone-health-team-markedly-improves-osteoporosis-screening-diagnosis-and-treatment-initiation-rates-compared-to-standard-primary-care-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology