Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose: In systemic lupus (SLE), concern exists about immunosuppressive drugs and lymphoma risk, Yet, the relative influence of disease activity vs treatment, is unknown. Our objective was to determine, in SLE, the relative importance of disease activity vs drugs.
Methods: We performed case-cohort analyses within a multi-site SLE cohort. Cancers were ascertained by cancer registry linkage. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for lymphoma were generated in multivariate regression models, for time-dependent exposures to immunomodulators (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrextate, mycophenolate, anti-malarials, glucocorticoids) demographics, calendar year, Sjogren’s syndrome, SLE duration, and disease activity(mean adjusted SLEDAI-2k). Partially adjusted models were also performed, using only covariates whose HR confidence interval excluded the null value. Sensitivity analyses were performed, lagging cyclophosphamide exposures by 5 years. We used average mean SLE disease activity scores over time, and medications were treated both categorically (ever/never) and as cumulative doses.
Results: We studied 64 lymphomas (61 non-Hodgkin’s, 3 Hodgkin’s) and 4,739 cancer-free controls. As is seen in the general population, lymphoma risk in SLE was higher in males versus females, and increased with age. Lymphoma cases occurred a mean of 13.1 years (standard deviation 9.8, median 12.3) after SLE diagnosis. Univariate analyses suggested a decreased lymphoma risk within the highest tertile of disease activity (relative to those with the lowest activity) but in fully adjusted models (using all variables listed above), the confidence interval widened to include the null value. Sensitivity analyses, lagging cyclophosphamide exposures, showed similar results to that portrayed in the table below. In a partially adjusted model (retaining age and highest tertile of disease activity), the HR suggested a two-fold lymphoma risk after cyclophosphamide. Despite a trend towards greater cyclophosphamide use in cases versus cancer-free controls, in fully adjusted models, no drug exposure was estimated to be an independent risk factor. Still, due to correlation, it remains difficult to differentiate the effects of medications from disease activity.
Conclusion: We did not definitively demonstrate an increased risk for any medications, despite a trend to greater cyclophosphamide use in the lymphoma cases. If anything, we noted a protective effect for very high SLE disease activity. Further work will focus on genetic profiles that might interact with medication exposures to influence lymphoma risk in SLE.
Results of the univariate and multivariate models to assess the hazard ratio (HR) of exposures on lymphoma development in patients with SLE
Variable |
Univariate HR (95% CI)* |
Partially adjusted model (95% CI) |
Multivarate HR (95% CI) |
Outside North America |
1.04 (0.53, 2.05) |
– |
1.06 (0.45, 2.50) |
Calendar year |
1.01 (0.98, 1.05) |
– |
0.98 (0.94, 1.02) |
Male |
2.47 (1.24, 4.92) |
– |
2.21 (1.05, 4.66) |
Age |
1.05 (1.03, 1.07) |
1.04 (1.03, 1.06) |
1.05 (1.03, 1.07) |
White race/ethnicity |
0.97 (0.55, 1.71) |
– |
0.86 (0.46, 1.59) |
Sjogren’s syndrome |
1.29 (0.66, 2.54) |
– |
1.21 (0.53, 2.78) |
Glucocorticosteroids (GC) ever |
1.39 (0.75, 2.56) |
– |
1.03 (0.40, 2.64) |
Cumulative GC**> 3.5 gm |
1.27 (0.75, 2.17) |
– |
1.59 (0.69, 3.67) |
Cyclophosphamide (CY) ever |
1.73 (0.90, 3.33) |
1.99 (1.00, 3.96) |
1.95 (0.61, 6.22) |
Cumulative CY > 6 gm |
1.51 (0.63, 3.62) |
– |
0.79 (0.18, 3.54) |
Azathioprine (AZA) ever |
0.82 (0.45, 1.52) |
– |
1.28 (0.53, 3.07) |
Cumulative AZA > 36.5 gm |
0.49 (0.19, 1.25) |
– |
0.46 (0.14, 1.54) |
Methotrexate ever used |
0.99 (0.45, 2.16) |
– |
0.79 (0.30, 2.05) |
Mycophenolate ever used |
1.38 (0.58, 3.29) |
– |
1.74 (0.70 4.34) |
Antimalarials ever used |
1.47 (0.80, 2.69) |
– |
1.39 (0.69, 2.78) |
Disease activity (2nd tertile)*** |
1.00 (0.55, 1.82) |
– |
1.10(0.56, 2.14) |
Disease activity (3rd tertile) |
0.43 (0.22, 0.84) |
0.49 (0.27, 0.90) |
0.52 (0.24, 1.12) |
*CI=confidence interval**Systemic glucocorticosteroids, considered in prednisone equivalent doses.***Mean adjusted SLE Disease Activity-2K (SLEDAI-2k)
Disclosure:
S. Bernatsky,
National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research,
2;
A. E. Clarke,
None;
K. H. Costenbader,
None;
M. B. Urowitz,
None;
D. D. Gladman,
None;
P. R. Fortin,
None;
M. Petri,
None;
S. Manzi,
None;
D. A. Isenberg,
None;
A. Rahman,
None;
D. Wallace,
None;
C. Gordon,
None;
C. Peschken,
None;
M. A. Dooley,
None;
E. M. Ginzler,
None;
C. Aranow,
None;
S. M. Edworthy,
None;
O. Nived,
None;
S. Jacobsen,
None;
G. Ruiz-Irastorza,
None;
E. H. Yelin,
None;
S. G. Barr,
None;
I. Blanco,
None;
C. H. Feldman,
None;
R. Ramsey-Goldman,
None.
« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lymphoma-risk-in-systemic-lupus-effects-of-disease-activity-versus-treatment/