ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1573

Baseline Screening Recommendations for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs:  Does an Educational Intervention Change Practice in an Outpatient Clinic?

Debra C. Lloyd1, John N. Mecchella2 and Daniel Albert3, 1Rheumatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH, 2Rheumatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 3Rheumatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines, DMARDs, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

In 2008, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) developed recommendations for use of non-biologic and biologic DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  The purpose of this study was to assess change in baseline screening practices following completion of an educational intervention reflecting the ACR recommendations.

Methods:

An educational intervention designed to update providers in and new recommendations from the ACR was completed in an outpatient rheumatology clinic in September 2009.  

Staff education activities included:  1) individual review of the ACR 2008 Recommendations for the Use of Non-biologic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis (DMARD); 2) development and review of “DMARD reference” sheets; 3) formal presentation of key points from the journal article to clinic staff.

Retrospective chart reviews were completed on new RA patients seen in a hospital-based outpatient clinic for a six month period immediately before and after review of the guidelines.   Documentation of recommended baseline screening test results (laboratory studies, imaging and tuberculosis testing) for DMARD was assessed.

Inclusion criteria:  1) New patient to rheumatology between 04/01/2009 and 03/31/2012 (NPW); 2), rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory arthritis (ICD 9 codes 714.0 and 714.9); 3) DMARD (methotrexate or leflunomide) therapy planned.

Exclusion criteria:  1) Alternate diagnosis after initial or subsequent evaluation; 2) no DMARD (methotrexate or leflunomide) treatment; 3) follow up appointment(s) cancelled or not attended; 4) not a new patient to rheumatology clinic; 5) current therapy with DMARD (prescribed at alternate site).

Baseline screening data for DMARDs and biologic agents was consistently identifiable in the patient record. 

A file for all patients with diagnosis code of 714.0 and 714.9, seen anywhere in the hospital/clinic system between 10/2007 and 12/2010, arriving as an NPW in rheumatology was reviewed.  There were 256 patients seen between 04/01/2009 and 03/31/2010.  184 records were reviewed.  Data for 144 records were excluded and data from 40 records (n= 20 pre-intervention; n= 20 post-intervention) were included.

Results:

Comparison of the results (CBC, LFTS, CREA, ALB, HEP B, HEP C, and CXR) for the two groups was completed using a χ² analysis and Fisher’s exact test and there was no significant difference between pre and post scores.

Baseline screening for DMARD therapy was completed in ≥ 90% of the baseline for CBC, LFTs, CREA and ALB in both the pre and post intervention periods.  Hepatitis B and C screening was completed in ≤ 25% of the pre and post intervention screenings.  CXR was completed in 20% of the pre-intervention baseline screenings and 50% of the post-intervention screenings but this difference did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusion:  

Completion of recommended baseline screening testing for patients receiving DMARD treatment did not increase after the educational intervention. This is constant with other failed attempts to change clinician behavior through short term educational interventions. This suggests that incorporating work flow redesign into the electronic medical record is likely to be more effective.


Disclosure:

D. C. Lloyd,
None;

J. N. Mecchella,
None;

D. Albert,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baseline-screening-recommendations-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-does-an-educational-intervention-change-practice-in-an-outpatient-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology