ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2931

Longitudinal Examination with Salivary Gland Ultrasonography (SGUS) of Patients with Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome: A Single Center Experience

Chiara Baldini1, Nicoletta Luciano1, Francesca Sernissi1, Daniela Martini1, Francesco Ferro1, Marta Mosca2 and Stefano Bombardieri2, 1University of Pisa, Rheumatology Unit, Pisa, Italy, 2Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Sjogren's syndrome and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Sjogren's Syndrome I: Clinical Perspectives

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Recently, convincing data have been published on the diagnostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). However, a limited number of information are available on the contribution of SGUS in the patients’ prognostic assessment and in the monitoring of the response to therapy during the follow-up. Aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate if SGUS might have a role in the prognostic stratification and in the monitoring of the disease activity in patients with pSS over the follow-up.

Methods:

The study population consisted of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of pSS (AECG 2002) who prospectively underwent clinical, laboratory and SGUS assessment at baseline, at 12 and at 24 months. An experienced rheumatologist scored the EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Activity Index (ESSDAI) at each follow-up time point. Patients received the “best-available-therapy” according to the clinical practice.  SGUS was performed by the same radiologist blinded to the rheumatologist clinical assessment. The parotid and submandibular glands  were  scanned on both sides by using a real-time US scanner (Esaote Technos MPX) with a 7.5-12.5 MHz transducer and the following US parameters were recorded: size, parenchymal echogenicity and inhomogeneity in the parotid and submandibular glands on both sides. A previously reported ultrasound scoring system (De Vita et al 1992) was used to grade the echostructure alterations of the salivary glands. Baseline, 12 months and 24 months SGUS results were compared using the non-parametric Friedman test for multiple comparisons. Correlation between SGUS and ESSDAI changes throughout the follow-up period was assessed using the Spearman linear correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.

Results:

From January 2012 and January 2014, 68 pSS patients were enrolled in this study (median (IQR) age: 54 (45-64) years). At the baseline 28/68 (41.2%) presented a SGUS score ≥2. These patients, when compared to the group of patients with a SGUS score <2, presented more frequently low C4 levels (p=0.04), positivity for anti-Ro/SSA (p<0.0001) and higher mean ESSDAI scores, with the ESSDAI positively correlating with the SGUS score (r=0.571, p<0.0001). Over the follow-up we still observed a positive correlation between the changes in the ESSDAI and the changes in the SGUS score (r=0.490, p<0.0001). However, no statistically significant differences were detected over the follow-up in the SGUS score across the multiple test performed and at the end of the study patients with grossly inhomogenous glands still presented evident inhomogeneities.

 Conclusion: This study highlighted the positive correlation between SGUS score and pSS disease activity. However, further research is needed before a conclusion can be made regarding the possibility of using SGUS in the assessment of the response to therapy in pSS.


Disclosure:

C. Baldini,
None;

N. Luciano,
None;

F. Sernissi,
None;

D. Martini,
None;

F. Ferro,
None;

M. Mosca,
None;

S. Bombardieri,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/longitudinal-examination-with-salivary-gland-ultrasonography-sgus-of-patients-with-primary-sjogrens-syndrome-a-single-center-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology