ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1997

Underuse of Methotrexate (MTX) in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in the United States (US): Results of a Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Claims Analysis

James R. O'Dell1, Melanie Rohr1, Stanley B. Cohen2, J Carter Thorne3 and Ted R. Mikuls1, 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 2Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologics, medical management, methotrexate (MTX), practice improvement and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: ACR Plenary Session II: Discovery 2015

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose:

MTX is the anchor DMARD for RA treatment, but there is limited information about its appropriate use in clinical practice. This claims analysis was aimed at gaining insight into how MTX is employed for RA treatment in the US.

Methods: The analysis used Symphony Health Solutions’ anonymized patient-level claims data which captures ~274 million US patients. The analysis included RA patients identified by ICD-9 codes 714.0 and 714.30 who initiated treatment with oral MTX in 2009 and were followed to 2014. Information obtained included: demographic characteristics, switches from oral to subcutaneous (SC) MTX and/or biologics (with or without concomitant MTX), timing of treatment changes, and oral MTX or SC MTX dosing at the times of switches/additions or end of follow-up. Independent t-tests were used to assess significance of differences among treatment paths.

Results: The study included 35,640 patients (Table).  Of these, 15,599 (43.8%) continued on oral MTX alone (Group 1), through the end of the follow-up period and 17,528 (49.2%) added or switched to a biologic agent (Group 2).  The median time to adding a biologic in Group 2 was 170 days and 41.5% of the patients added a biologic within 90 days of initiating oral MTX.  In addition, only 7% of patients switched from oral to SC MTX (Group 3) after a median of 534 days of oral therapy; 14.0% of these patients switched within the first 90 days of oral MTX treatment. Overall, 71% of patients who switched from oral to SC MTX remained on this treatment for approximately 3 years and those who added a biologic did so after a median of 289 days. Median time for progression to a biologic was significantly longer (823 days; time on oral + time on SC) for patients who received SC MTX vs those who received only oral drug (170 days) (P<0.0001).  

Oral MTX Initiation 2009

N=35,640

 

Duration of Oral MTX Prior to Biologic (days)

Oral MTX Dose Prior to Biologic (mg/week)

SC MTX Dose Prior  to Biologic (mg/week)

Duration of SC MTX Prior  to Biologic  (days)

MTX Dose at Last Follow-up  2014 (mg/week)

n

(%)

Mean ± SD

Median

Group 1:

Remained on only oral MTX through 2014

15,599

(43.8%)

NA

NA

NA

NA

15 ± 5

15

Group 2:

Biologic initiated during follow-up period

17,528

(49.2%)

478 ± 580

170

15 ± 5

15

NA

NA

NA

Group 3:

Switched from oral to SC MTX and remained on this treatment or had biologic added

2,513

(7.0%)

729 ± 6231

534

17 ± 51

15

21 ± 52

20

457 ± 4562

289

21 ± 53

20

1. P<0.0001 vs Group 2

2. For 711 patients who switched to a biologic

3. For 1,802 patients who remained on SC MTX until the end of follow-up

 

Conclusion:

In the US, MTX is frequently under-dosed, given for an inadequate length of time, and rarely switched to SC before the initiation of biologic therapy. More than 40% of RA patients who initiate treatment with oral MTX switched to or had a biologic added within 90 days after a median dose of only 15 mg/week. Switching to SC MTX prevents the need for or significantly extends time to a biologic.  More appropriate optimization of MTX could lead to better control of RA and would be expected to produce significant cost savings.


Disclosure: J. R. O'Dell, Medac Pharma, Inc, 5,Antares, 5,Abbvie, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5; M. Rohr, None; S. B. Cohen, Amgen, 2,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2,Abbvie, 2,UCB, 2,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,Amgen, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Medac Pharma Inc, 5; J. C. Thorne, Abbvie, 5,Amgen, 5,AstraZeneca, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,Celgene, 5,Centocor, Inc., 5,Genzyme Corporation, 5,Hospira, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,Genzyme Corporation, 8,Medac Pharma Inc, 8,Antares, 8,Abbvie, 2,Amgen, 2,AstraZeneca, 2,Celgene, 2,Eli Lilly and Company, 2,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2; T. R. Mikuls, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

O'Dell JR, Rohr M, Cohen SB, Thorne JC, Mikuls TR. Underuse of Methotrexate (MTX) in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in the United States (US): Results of a Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Claims Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/underuse-of-methotrexate-mtx-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-in-the-united-states-us-results-of-a-comprehensive-pharmaceutical-claims-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/underuse-of-methotrexate-mtx-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-in-the-united-states-us-results-of-a-comprehensive-pharmaceutical-claims-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology