ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 971

Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Sarilumab Compared to Intravenous Tocilizumab in Patients with RA

Paul Emery1, Juan Rondon2, Anju Garg3, Hubert van Hoogstraten3, Neil Graham4, Ming Liu5, Janie Parrino6, Alberto J. Spindler7 and Nancy Liu5, 1Division of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Elite Research Institute, Miami, FL, 3Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, 4Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, 5Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, 6Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, 7Rheumatology, Hospital Padilla, Tucuman, Argentina

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: clinical trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I: Biologics

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: The investigational drug
sarilumab is a human mAb directed against the IL-6 receptor. In previous
studies, sarilumab + MTX demonstrated efficacy in patients (pts) with
moderate-to-severe RA and was generally well tolerated.1 Sarilumab
and tocilizumab have the same mechanism of action. Two studies, Study 1309 (NCT02097524)
and ASCERTAIN (NCT01768572), described
the safety and tolerability of sarilumab and tocilizumab in adults with RA.

Methods: In the 6-wk Study 1309 (N=101), adult
RA pts on background MTX were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive a single dose of sarilumab
150 mg subcutaneously (SC), sarilumab 200 mg SC, tocilizumab 4 mg/kg intravenously
(IV), or tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV. In the 24-wk ASCERTAIN study (N=202), RA pts
on background DMARDs with inadequate response to or intolerant of TNF
antagonists were randomized 1:1:2 to sarilumab 150 or 200 mg SC every 2 wks or
tocilizumab every 4 wks starting at 4 mg/kg with an increase to 8 mg/kg if
needed, based on clinical response.

Results: Study 1309 and
ASCERTAIN enrolled RA patients who were predominantly female (>80%), with a mean
age of 55 and 52 yrs, respectively. In ASCERTAIN, 61% of pts on tocilizumab increased
their dose from 4 to 8 mg/kg during the treatment period; 42% of pts increased
their dose at wk 4. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar
for the sarilumab and tocilizumab groups in each study (Table). Upper
respiratory tract infections and neutropenia were among the most frequently
reported TEAEs. Laboratory changes in both studies included increases in lipids
and transaminases and decreases in neutrophil counts. Mean changes in absolute
neutrophil count (ANC) in the sarilumab groups were within the ranges observed
in tocilizumab groups. There was no association between decreased ANC and
incidence of infection. Study 1309 demonstrated that time to onset for
decreased ANC and magnitude of decrease were comparable across the sarilumab
and tocilizumab groups for all doses (Figure).

Conclusion: Overall, there was no
clinically meaningful difference between the treatment groups with regards to
clinical adverse events. Laboratory changes noted in the sarilumab
groups were within the same range as those noted in the tocilizumab groups. Differences
in incidence of ANC <1.0 Giga/L between the sarilumab and tocilizumab groups
in ASCERTAIN may reflect differences in dosing interval and sampling schedule.

1. Genovese et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1424-1437.

 

Table. Overview of Adverse Events and Laboratory Parameters in Study 1309 and ASCERTAIN

 

Study 1309

ASCERTAIN

 

Patients, n (%)

Patients, n (%)

 

Tocilizumab IV 4 mg/kg (n=25)

Tocilizumab IV 8 mg/kg (n=24)

Sarilumab SC 150 mg (n=26)

Sarilumab SC 200 mg (n=26)

Tocilizumab

IV 4 mg/kg (n=102)

Sarilumab

SC 150 mg (n=49)

Sarilumab

SC 200 mg (n=51)

Overview

TEAEs

8 (32%)

12 (50%)

10 (39%)

12 (46%)

68 (67%)

33 (67%)

36 (71%)

SAEs

0

1 (4%)

0

0

7 (7%)

1 (2%)

3 (6%)

   Serious infections

0

0

0

0

2 (2%)

0

1 (2%)

TEAEs leading to death

0

0

0

0

1 (1%)

0

0

Laboratory parameters

Absolute neutrophil countsa

 

 

 

 

 

 

   <1.0 Giga/L

3 (12%)

6 (25%)

4 (15%)

7 (27%)

1 (1%)

3 (6%)

5 (10%)

ALTb

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    >3 times ULN

0

2 (8%)

0

1 (4%)

3 (3%)

2 (4%)

3 (6%)

Total cholesterolc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     ≥6.2 mmol/L

9 (36%)

6 (25%)

9 (35%)

11 (42%)

50 (50%)

27 (56%)

23 (45%)

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; IV, intravenously; SAE, serious adverse event; SC, subcutaneously; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; ULN, upper limit of normal. a1309: 17 post-baseline ANC sampling time points over 43 days; ASCERTAIN: 12 post-baseline ANC sampling time points over 24 weeks. b1309: 5 post-baseline LFT sampling time points over 43 days; ASCERTAIN: 9 post-baseline LFT sampling time points over 24 weeks. c1309: 2 post-baseline lipid sampling time points over 43 days; ASCERTAIN: 5 post-baseline lipid sampling time points over 24 weeks.

 

Figure. Mean percent change from baseline in ANC by treatment and visit.
ANC, absolute neutrophil count; IV, intravenously; SC, subcutaneously.


Disclosure: P. Emery, Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, UCB, 2,Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, UCB, 5; J. Rondon, None; A. Garg, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 1,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 3; H. van Hoogstraten, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 1,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 3; N. Graham, Regeneron, 1,Regeneron, 3; M. Liu, None; J. Parrino, Regeneron, 1,Regeneron, 3; A. J. Spindler, None; N. Liu, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Emery P, Rondon J, Garg A, van Hoogstraten H, Graham N, Liu M, Parrino J, Spindler AJ, Liu N. Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Sarilumab Compared to Intravenous Tocilizumab in Patients with RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-tolerability-of-subcutaneous-sarilumab-compared-to-intravenous-tocilizumab-in-patients-with-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-tolerability-of-subcutaneous-sarilumab-compared-to-intravenous-tocilizumab-in-patients-with-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology