ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 13

Epidemiology of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Population-Based Study

Ali Duarte-Garcia1, Michael Pham1, Cynthia S. Crowson2, Kevin Moder3, Rajiv Pruthi4 and Eric L. Matteson5, 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 3Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 4Mayo Clinic, R, MN, 5Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The epidemiology of definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the general population has not been described. A recent meta-analysis (Andreoli L, et al. Arth Care Res 2013;65:1869-73) concluded that it was difficult to determine the frequency of a “clinically significant antiphospholipid (aPL) profile” in patients with aPL-related clinical outcomes due to the lack of robust data; only 4% of the studies had the current cutoff values for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and less than one fifth of them had confirmation after 6-12 weeks. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of definite APS based on the 2006 updated international consensus (Sydney) classification criteria.

Methods: An inception cohort of patients with incident APS in 2000-2015 in a geographically well-defined population were identified based on comprehensive individual medical record review. All cases met the definite 2006 Sydney consensus APS criteria, including the laboratory and clinical criteria as well as laboratory confirmation after 12 weeks. Lupus anticoagulant, IgM and IgG aCL and anti-β2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies were tested in a centralized lab (cutoff >40 GPL/MPL). Incidence rates were age and sex adjusted to the US white 2010 population. Prevalence estimates were obtained from the incidence rates assuming no increased mortality associated with APS and assuming migration in/out of the area was independent of disease status.

Results: In 2000-2015, 33 cases of incident APS were identified (mean age 54.2 years, 55% female; 97% Caucasian). The annual incidence of definite APS was 2.0 per 100,000 population aged ≥ 18 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.1 per 100,000). Incidence rates were similar in both sexes (2.1 per 100,000 population in females and 2.0 per 100,000 population in males). The peak incidence was observed in those who were older than 75 years. Significant changes in incidence rates over time were not observed. Six (18%) of the patients had a concurrent diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Three (17%) patients had obstetric manifestations. During a median follow-up of 8.8 years, 7 patients died (84% survival at 10 years after APS incidence; 95% CI: 69-100%). The overall mortality of patients with APS was not significantly different from the general population (standardized mortality ratio: 1.14; 95% CI, 0.46-2.64). The estimated prevalence of APS adjusted to the US white 2010 population was 50 per 100,000 (95% CI: 42-58) and was similar in both sexes (51/100,000 for females and 48/100,000 for males). Based on this and US census data, an estimated 119,300 persons in the US were affected by APS in 2015.

Conclusion: Results from this first ever population based study revealed that definite APS occurred in about 2 persons per 100,000 per year. The estimated prevalence is 50 per 100,000. Overall mortality was not different from the general population. The prevalence of APS in the same population was at least as common as SLE (Jarukitsopa, et al. Arth Care Res 2015;67:817-28).


Disclosure: A. Duarte-Garcia, None; M. Pham, None; C. S. Crowson, None; K. Moder, None; R. Pruthi, None; E. L. Matteson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Duarte-Garcia A, Pham M, Crowson CS, Moder K, Pruthi R, Matteson EL. Epidemiology of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Population-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/epidemiology-of-antiphospholipid-syndrome-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/epidemiology-of-antiphospholipid-syndrome-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology