ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 512

Efficacy Response to Baricitinib Based on Baseline Characteristics in Patients Who Are Inadequate Responders to Conventional DMARD

Maxime Dougados1, Terence P. Rooney2, Li Xie2, Rena Klar3, Christina L. Dickson2, Ana Pinto Correia2, Yoshiya Tanaka4, Michael Schiff5 and Edward C. Keystone6, 1Department of Rheumatology, Rene Descartes University, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Quintiles IMS Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC, 4The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 5University of Colorado, Greenwood Village, CO, 6University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I: Comorbidities and Adverse Events; Efficacy and Safety of Small Molecules

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease and some patients (pts) have an inadequate response (IR) to conventional DMARDs (csDMARDs). Baricitinib is an oral, selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK 21 approved in the EU for the treatment of moderately to severely active RA in adults. We evaluated the effects of baseline characteristics, including prior csDMARD use, on the efficacy of bari in csDMARD-IR pts.

Methods: Eligible pts had active RA, were csDMARD-IR and biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve, and were randomized to bari 4 mg or placebo in 5 global, randomized trials (2 Phase 3, 3 Phase 2). This analysis pooled data to evaluate efficacy outcomes (ACR50, DAS28-CRP ≤3.2, change from baseline in HAQ-DI) at Week (Wk) 12 in bari 4 mg vs placebo for potential subgroup interactions based on a variety of baseline characteristics including age, gender, weight, disease duration, etc. A logistic regression model was used to detect significant interactions; p-value ≤0.1 was considered significant, with significance in >1 measure given more weight.

Results: Overall samples were N=881 (4 mg) and N=803 (placebo). Pts were aged ~52 years, ~80% were female, and 44-49% had a history of 1 prior csDMARD (Table 1). In the overall pooled population at Wk 12, responses for ACR50, DAS28-CRP ≤3.2, and HAQ-DI change from baseline were significantly improved for bari 4 mg vs placebo (Tables 2, 3). Across subgroups, odds ratios and least squares mean difference (LSMDs) predominately favored bari 4 mg over placebo at Wk 12 (Tables 2, 3) and were generally similar to the overall pooled population. Significant quantitative interactions were observed for bari 4 mg vs placebo for BMI in ACR50 and DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 (Table 2) and for race in ACR50 and DAS28-CRP ≤3.2. No significant interactions were observed for the number of prior cDMARDs. No qualitative interactions were observed.

Conclusion: Consistent with results in the overall pooled population of csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-naïve pts, at Wk 12 the point estimate for each endpoint favored baricitinib 4 mg vs placebo across subgroups. Thus, baricitinib demonstrated a consistent, beneficial treatment effect in subgroups, irrespective of baseline characteristics.

1.       Fridman JS et al. J Immunol 2010;184:5298-5307.


Disclosure: M. Dougados, AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB, Merck, Roche, BMS, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB, Merck, Roche, BMS, UCB, 5; T. P. Rooney, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; L. Xie, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; R. Klar, Quintiles IMS Holdings, 3; C. L. Dickson, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; A. Pinto Correia, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; Y. Tanaka, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Astellas, AbbVie, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Kyowa- Kirin, Eisai, Ono, 2,Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, YL Biologics, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, 8; M. Schiff, AbbVie, Amgen, Antares, BMS, Eli Lilly and Company, JJ, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 5,Abbvie, BMS, 8; E. C. Keystone, Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 2,Abbott, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbott, Astra Zeneca, BMS Canada, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dougados M, Rooney TP, Xie L, Klar R, Dickson CL, Pinto Correia A, Tanaka Y, Schiff M, Keystone EC. Efficacy Response to Baricitinib Based on Baseline Characteristics in Patients Who Are Inadequate Responders to Conventional DMARD [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-response-to-baricitinib-based-on-baseline-characteristics-in-patients-who-are-inadequate-responders-to-conventional-dmard/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-response-to-baricitinib-based-on-baseline-characteristics-in-patients-who-are-inadequate-responders-to-conventional-dmard/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology