ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2983

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor, or Adalimumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Dmards: A Randomized, Placebo‑Controlled, Phase 3 Trial

Philip J Mease1, Stephen Hall2, Oliver FitzGerald3, Désirée van der Heijde4, Joseph F Merola5, Francisco Avila-Zapata6, Dorata Cieślak7, Daniela Graham8, Cunshan Wang9, Sujatha Menon9, Thijs Hendrikx8 and Keith Kanik9, 1Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Cabrini Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3Department of Rheumatology, St Vincent’s University Hospital and Conway Institute, University College, Dublin, Ireland, 4Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 5Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 6Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo Especializado de la Investigacion Clinica en Yucatan S.C.P., Yucatán, Mexico, 7Poznan University, Poznan, Poland, 8Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 9Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Adalimumab, Psoriatic arthritis, tofacitinib and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Plenary Session III: Discovery 2016

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor under investigation for treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study evaluated tofacitinib efficacy and safety vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with active PsA.

Methods: This was a randomized, PBO- and active-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, Phase 3 study. Eligible pts had a diagnosis of PsA for ≥6 months, fulfilled ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR), had active arthritis (≥3 tender/painful and ≥3 swollen joints) and active plaque psoriasis, inadequate response to ≥1 csDMARD, and were tumor necrosis factor-inhibitor-naïve. Pts were randomized 2:2:2:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID; n=107), tofacitinib 10 mg BID (n=104), adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks (n=106), PBO→tofacitinib 5 mg BID (n=52) or PBO→tofacitinib 10 mg BID (n=53). Pts who initially received PBO advanced to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID in a blinded manner at Month (M) 3. Ongoing treatment with a stable dose of 1 csDMARD was mandatory. Pts were followed through M12. The primary endpoints were ACR20 response rate and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (ΔHAQ-DI) at M3.

Results: Pt demographics and baseline disease characteristics were similar across groups (Table 1). Of the 422 randomized pts, 405 (96.0%) completed M3 and 373 (88.4%) completed M12. Significantly greater improvements in ACR20 response rates and ΔHAQ-DI were observed for both tofacitinib doses vs PBO at M3 and were maintained to M12 (Table 2); greater improvements were also observed for adalimumab vs PBO. Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID demonstrated superiority vs PBO for ACR20 response rate as early as Week 2 (22.4% and 31.7% vs 5.7%; p<0.001). Secondary efficacy endpoints supported the primary findings (Table 2). Safety findings through M12 were similar between groups (Table 3). The most common adverse events over 12 months were upper respiratory tract infection (7.5–10.6% of pts across groups), nasopharyngitis (7.5–11.5%), and headache (3.8–10.6%).

Conclusion: Tofacitinib was superior to PBO in ACR20 response rate and ΔHAQ-DI at M3, with superiority vs PBO as early as Week 2 (first assessment) for ACR20, which was maintained to M12. Secondary endpoints supported the primary analyses. No new safety risks were identified vs previous studies in RA or psoriasis pts.

 


Disclosure: P. J. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sun, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Corrona, Dermira, Janssen, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sun, UCB, Zynerba, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Genetech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB, 8; S. Hall, Pfizer Inc, Celgene, Roche, AbbVie, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, 5; O. FitzGerald, Pfizer Inc, 5; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Merk, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 5,Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9; J. F. Merola, Biogen Idec, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Janssen, Momenta, Mallinckrodt, 5,Biogen Idec, 2,AbbVie, Eli-Lilly, 8; F. Avila-Zapata, None; D. Cieślak, None; D. Graham, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; C. Wang, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; S. Menon, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; T. Hendrikx, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; K. Kanik, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease PJ, Hall S, FitzGerald O, van der Heijde D, Merola JF, Avila-Zapata F, Cieślak D, Graham D, Wang C, Menon S, Hendrikx T, Kanik K. Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor, or Adalimumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Dmards: A Randomized, Placebo‑Controlled, Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-an-oral-janus-kinase-inhibitor-or-adalimumab-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-conventional-synthetic-dmards-a-randomized/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-an-oral-janus-kinase-inhibitor-or-adalimumab-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-conventional-synthetic-dmards-a-randomized/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology